On Thursday 2011-12-29 19:47, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >Hi! > >JFYI: I just uploaded libnetfilter_acct to git.netfilter.org. > >http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libnetfilter_acct.git;a=summary > >This library provides the programming interface (API) to the Netfilter >extended accounting infrastructure. It includes the documentation in >doxygen format and a couple of examples. > >The first client of this library will be the `nfacct' tool. > >I'm thinking about including this tool into the iptables tree, instead >of distributing it separately, but I may change my mind. Let me know >if you have any preference. It would pose - just formally - the question how many more tools we intend to ship with iptables. For example, try to find an answer as to why conntrack-tools and ipset are separate instead of being included in iptables. I am not particular for or against, since there is already e.g. nfnl_osf (and libipq...) in the iptables tree, for a lack of a better place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
