On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:40:09AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 10:24:09AM -0500, Mike Maxim wrote: > > The reason I put that in is because the size of that table becomes > > more relevant/important if you decide to use the weights in the manner > > the patch lets you. It would be conceivable that someone might need to > > increase the size of that table to accommodate their configuration, so > > I thought it would be handy to be able to do that through the regular > > configuration system instead of editing the source. > > Hi Mike, > > I agree, but I think its also reasonable to consider IP_VS_SH_TAB_BITS as > a separate change. > > Could you > > 1. Split the patch into a Kconfig patch and a ip_vs_sh.c patch > 2. Remove spurious line additions from the resulting patches? Scratch that, please follow Pablo's request. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
