Re: RAW netfilter - "advanced netfilter setting" or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2011-11-23 23:02, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion, NETFILTER_ADVANCED should be changed to only control
>> the visibility of all suboptions, i.e. I suggest that "default m if
>> NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n" be done for all non-deprecated modules.
>> (Similar to how CONFIG_EXPERT works.)
>
>No thank you. That makes the whole option pointless. [...]
>The whole point of NETFILTER_ADVANCED is for people like me who
>actually want a fairly *minimal* kernel config, and probably one that
>has no modules.

Right, but how would you decide what will be enabled/disabled by
default? It seems unlikely you will be adding a patch (like Dave's)
everytime a default distro installation throws certain errors once
you run your own kernel configs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux