On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:38:28PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 2011-11-14 10:19, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > > > >On Sunday, November 13, 2011 18:05:28 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >> BTW, I think you should split xt_HMARK to ipt_HMARK and ip6t_HMARK > >> (see recent Florian Westphal patches regarding reserve lookup for > >> instance). > >> > >> The IPv4 and IPv6 parts for HMARK look so different that I don't think > >> it makes sense to keep them into one single xt_HMARK thing with all > >> those conditional ifdefs for IPV6. > >> > >Ok I'll do that, for some reason a thought it was better with one module. > > So do I. The module overhead is so much larger. Yes, it will if both modules are loaded. I think it depends, if you only load IPv4 support, the overhead will be smaller than having everything into one module. But I'm open to more discussion on this, of course. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
