On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:44:38PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > Alexey / Pablo, > > --On 12 September 2011 20:06:25 +0100 Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Pablo, > > > >--On 12 September 2011 20:33:57 +0200 Pablo Neira Ayuso > ><pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>Yes, this is what Alexey was pointing out in the previous email and > >>why he suggested to move it to nfnetlink_has_listeners (to cover the > >>expectation case). > >> > >>But you're right, we cannot move it to nfnetlink_has_listeners because > >>of the item->report case. Please, include the expectation part and > >>resend the patch. > > > >Thanks - see below > > Is this new version OK? I am happy to adjust if not. Hm, I still think that this is a workaround. The nice fix should move nf_conntrack_event_cb in nf_conntrack_ecache.c to the net container structure. Alexey? > I think we ought to get /something/ in, because without anything it's > very simple to cause an oops and a resultant machine hang. Sure, I'm all for fixing it :-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html