Re: [PATCH 3rd revision] Add SELinux context support to AUDIT target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 02:13:18 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 6/8/2011 7:49 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 06:32:35 AM Mr Dash Four wrote:
> >> Add SELinux context support to AUDIT target - 3rd revision (style-type
> >> changes made *only* since 2nd revision of this patch). Typical (raw
> > 
> >> auditd) output after applying this patch would be:
> > <snip>
> > 
> >> @@ -163,6 +170,15 @@ audit_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct
> >> xt_action_param *par) break;
> >> 
> >>  	}
> >> 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK
> >> +	if (skb->secmark) {
> >> +	  	if (!security_secid_to_secctx(skb->secmark, &secctx, &len)) {
> >> +			audit_log_format(ab, " obj=%s", secctx);
> >> +			security_release_secctx(secctx, len);
> >> +		}
> > 
> > else
> > 
> > 	audit_log_format(ab, " osid=%u", skb->secmark);
> > 
> > _All_  audit code records the number on a failed conversion.
> 
> But it really shouldn't. An unconvertible secid is indicative
> of a serious, unrecoverable failure within the LSM. It's every
> bit as bad as an invalid pointer.

I agree with that point. But do the LSM's panic the kernel or send an audit event that 
they could not convert something? Besides my patch to the patch, how is this error 
preserved in the audit trail?

-Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux