On 03/06/11 23:50, Bernhard Held wrote:
Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell:
On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge).
All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses.
Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from
going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two
of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the
same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related.
Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter &
cc'd to kvm,
but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to
netdev has
not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped
into the
bit bucket also.
Just another reference 3.5 months ago:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html
<waves hands around shouting "I have a reproducible test case for this
and don't mind patching and crashing the machine to get it fixed">
Attempted to add netfilter-devel to the cc this time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
