Re: Possible iptables 4.4.11 issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/05/11 16:48, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Sunday 2011-05-29 16:33, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> After upgrading iptables to 1.4.11 the following iptables-restore error
>> is produced:
>>
>> iptables-restore v1.4.11: owner: option "--uid-owner" cannot be inverted.
> 
> Bug, fix will be submitted.
> 
>> -A OUTPUT -p 6 --dport 888 -o eth1 -j IPMARK --addr
>> dst --and-mask -1 --or-mask -64 --shift 0
>> After upgrading to iptables 1.4.11 the following iptables-restore error is
>> produced:
>>
>> iptables-restore v1.4.11: IPMARK: Bad value for "and-mask" option: "-1"
> 
> This is intentional. Bitwise operations work best when fed unsigned numbers
> only.

but this used to work, we shouldn't break this sort of things Jan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux