Uhm, if it's ip proto independent then it shouldn't be defined in
xtables-multi in the #ifdef ENABLE_IPV4 section... right?
Or I'm missing something? It should be usable if you're creating a
static build of xtables-multi with only ipv6 support, correct?
2011/5/30 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Monday 2011-05-30 13:57, Maciej Åenczykowski wrote:
>
>>ie. this commit, in xtables-multi.c should probably change:
>>
>> Â Â Â {"iptables-xml", Â Â Â Âiptables_xml_main},
>> Â Â Â {"xml4", Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âiptables_xml_main},
>>#endif
>>
>>to
>>
>>#endif
>> Â Â Â {"iptables-xml", Â Â Â Âiptables_xml_main},
>> Â Â Â {"xml", Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â iptables_xml_main},
>>
>>(and maybe add an ip6tables-xml alias as well?)
>
> nope, the xml subcomponent is a nfproto-independent text-to-text
> translator IIRC.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
