On Monday 2011-05-23 17:47, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >On 23/05/11 16:29, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> On 19.05.2011 00:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> Hej, >>> >>> >>> While working with a customer setup, I came up with this funny idea >>> of plugging a no-op NFCT helper in to workaround some nfct_ftp >>> problem. Besides that, it may also be used to simply skip helping and >>> save cycles. See the patch's message for details - I'd love to hear >>> something about it. >>> >>> (NB: nf_nat_ftp was loaded, but not used when connecting between netA >>> and netB.) >> >> Wouldn't a flag to the CT target to skip the helper lookup work as well? > >Indeed. Yes, but how would xt_CT.ko convey to NFCT then that no helper is supposed to be used? Calling nf_ct_helper_ext_add, but then leave help at NULL? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
