On 10/05/11 12:05, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch reverts a2361c8735e07322023aedc36e4938b35af31eb0:
> "[PATCH] netfilter: xt_conntrack: warn about use in raw table"
>
> Florian Wesphal says:
> "... when the packet was sent from the local machine the skb
> already has ->nfct attached, and -m conntrack seems to do
> the right thing."
Sorry, the description and the patch doesn't match, the correct patch is
attached. I have pushed this to my branch.
>From 93bbce1ad0cd788190dd7d6c17d289f771fe3d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:13:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: revert a2361c8735e07322023aedc36e4938b35af31eb0
This patch reverts a2361c8735e07322023aedc36e4938b35af31eb0:
"[PATCH] netfilter: xt_conntrack: warn about use in raw table"
Florian Wesphal says:
"... when the packet was sent from the local machine the skb
already has ->nfct attached, and -m conntrack seems to do
the right thing."
Acked-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Florian Wesphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c b/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c
index 481a86f..61805d7 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c
@@ -272,11 +272,6 @@ static int conntrack_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par)
{
int ret;
- if (strcmp(par->table, "raw") == 0) {
- pr_info("state is undetermined at the time of raw table\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
ret = nf_ct_l3proto_try_module_get(par->family);
if (ret < 0)
pr_info("cannot load conntrack support for proto=%u\n",
--
1.7.2.3
