On 10/05/11 12:05, pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch reverts a2361c8735e07322023aedc36e4938b35af31eb0: > "[PATCH] netfilter: xt_conntrack: warn about use in raw table" > > Florian Wesphal says: > "... when the packet was sent from the local machine the skb > already has ->nfct attached, and -m conntrack seems to do > the right thing." Sorry, the description and the patch doesn't match, the correct patch is attached. I have pushed this to my branch.
>From 93bbce1ad0cd788190dd7d6c17d289f771fe3d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:13:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: revert a2361c8735e07322023aedc36e4938b35af31eb0 This patch reverts a2361c8735e07322023aedc36e4938b35af31eb0: "[PATCH] netfilter: xt_conntrack: warn about use in raw table" Florian Wesphal says: "... when the packet was sent from the local machine the skb already has ->nfct attached, and -m conntrack seems to do the right thing." Acked-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Florian Wesphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c | 5 ----- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c b/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c index 481a86f..61805d7 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_conntrack.c @@ -272,11 +272,6 @@ static int conntrack_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) { int ret; - if (strcmp(par->table, "raw") == 0) { - pr_info("state is undetermined at the time of raw table\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - ret = nf_ct_l3proto_try_module_get(par->family); if (ret < 0) pr_info("cannot load conntrack support for proto=%u\n", -- 1.7.2.3