On Friday 2011-05-06 19:38, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >The FTP conntrack code currently only accepts the following format for >the 227 response for PASV: >227 Entering Passive Mode (148,100,81,40,31,161). > >It doesn't accept the following format from an obscure server: >227 Data transfer will passively listen to 67,218,99,134,50,144 > >From RFC 1123: The format of the 227 reply to a PASV command is not >well standardized. In particular, an FTP client cannot assume that the >parentheses shown on page 40 of RFC-959 will be present (and in fact, >Figure 3 on page 43 omits them). Therefore, a User-FTP program that >interprets the PASV reply must scan the reply for the first digit of >the host and port numbers. > >This patch adds support for the RFC 1123 clarification[...] > >Tracked in: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466279 "You are not authorized to access bug #466279." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
