Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:38:57PM CET, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx> >Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:38:03 +0100 > >> Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:02:51AM CET, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:50:09 +0100 >>> >>>>>Jiri, I know there is your patch set there, but I think you and Changli >>>>>still need to go back and forth one more time wrt. orig_dev semantics. >>>>>Since you have been posting this patch set for some time I'm still >>>>>willing to apply it for this merge window, but please make haste and >>>>>work out the remaining discussion. Thank you. >>>> >>>> Dave, you can apply the rest of the series and leave only the first >>>> patch (af_packet) out. There's no dependency. We will figure out things >>>> around origdev later. >>> >>>I was about to do that but I've found other problems. >>> >>>You cannot make the modifications you make to linux/if.h, those >>>interface flags are visible to userspace. >> >> What do you suggest? To remove unused flags and leave gaps there or to >> not to remove the flags at all? > >You can't remove them, otherwise if it happened to be reference in the >sources to some app out there, it will start to fail to compile. > >This is pretty obvious stuff, I hope :-) Ok :( So would you leave out if.h hunk out or should I repost? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
