From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> As Stephen correctly points out, we need to return -ENOENT in xt_find_match()/xt_find_target() after the patch "netfilter: x_tables: misuse of try_then_request_module" in order to properly indicate a non-existant module to the caller. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c index 271eed3..a9adf4c 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_unregister_matches); struct xt_match *xt_find_match(u8 af, const char *name, u8 revision) { struct xt_match *m; - int err = 0; + int err = -ENOENT; if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&xt[af].mutex) != 0) return ERR_PTR(-EINTR); @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_request_find_match); struct xt_target *xt_find_target(u8 af, const char *name, u8 revision) { struct xt_target *t; - int err = 0; + int err = -ENOENT; if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&xt[af].mutex) != 0) return ERR_PTR(-EINTR); -- 1.7.2.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html