On 09.03.2011 21:21, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Wednesday 2011-03-09 20:54, Florian Westphal wrote: > >> Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 2011-03-08 16:11, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> >>>> Am 05.03.2011 17:08, schrieb Florian Westphal: >>>>> From: Florian Westphal <fwestphal@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> followup patch will add ipv6 support. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fwestphal@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> include/linux/netfilter/Kbuild | 1 + >>>>> .../ipt_addrtype.h => netfilter/xt_addrtype.h} | 16 +++++----- >>>> >>>> Please keep this file and the original definitions for a while >>>> (add to feature-removal-schedule) for compatibility. You can >>>> redefine them to the xt_ values/structures so they can be used >>>> inside the kernel. >>> >>> Just like ipt_realm.h does, yeah. >> >> Sorry, redefining structures and enums is really not my cup of tea. >> >> If thats really what you would prefer (as opposed to keeping the file >> as-is) I can send a V3 patch that includes xt_addrtype.h and then >> re-defines the enums/structures with the ipt_ prefixes. >> >> But personally I would prefer to just keep it as-is and then remove it >> in a year or so. > > I don't mind, t'was just a suggestion because ipt_realm happened to hit > my eye. I don't mind either as long as we keep the old definitions. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
