On 16/02/11 18:52, Sam Roberts wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Probably you have hit one of the bugs that went into 2.6.37. Please, try >> the patch attached. IIRC, this is fixed in -stable and 2.6.38 and later >> kernels. > > Since I'm not yet building my kernels from source, its easier for me > to build a newer kernel than to find an old one and patch it. > > Stable is 2.6.37, I'll try 2.6.38-rc5. I'm using 2.6.37 with the patch that I sent you in one of my firewalls: $ uname -a Linux debian2 2.6.37 #7 SMP Mon Feb 7 10:34:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux Everything works fine. > userspace connection trackers seems a bit bleading edge, I'd be happy > to build your latest code from git if you point me to it. http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=conntrack-tools.git;a=summary It's stable, I'll release 1.0 soon. Some more work can be done on it to port it to libmnl, add H323 and SIP support, active-active support, among tons of many other improvements. But that can be done in the future. > I'm now two steps back since upgrading from ubuntu's default kernel > 2.6..35 and tools 0.9.14. > > It used to be everything but setting expectations was working for me, > but I no longer get updates at all about the conntrack table, and > neither does conntrack -E or -L: > > % sudo conntrack -L conntrack > conntrack v0.9.15 (conntrack-tools): 0 flow entries have been shown. As said, here works fine with the patch that I attached ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
