Re: GRO/GSO hiding PMTU?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:55:55 -0800 (PST)

> I suspect that the packet arrives on eth1, accumulates into GRO, and
> thus marked as GSO as well, then GSO/TSO on output to eth0 is
> re-segmenting things transparently, and we're not getting the ICMP
> frag-needed message and the packet drop because of the skb_is_gso()
> check in ip_forward().
> 
> 	if (unlikely(skb->len > dst_mtu(&rt->dst) && !skb_is_gso(skb) &&
> 		     (ip_hdr(skb)->frag_off & htons(IP_DF))) && !skb->local_df) {
> 		IP_INC_STATS(dev_net(rt->dst.dev), IPSTATS_MIB_FRAGFAILS);
> 		icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED,
> 			  htonl(dst_mtu(&rt->dst)));
> 		goto drop;
> 	}
> 
> So if that's what is happening, that's cute, but I think we need to
> fix this :-)
> 
> Perhaps the check in ip_forward() should instead validate the gso_size
> in the skb_is_gso() case?
> 
> That'd be a little tricky since gso_size is an MSS value whereas what
> we're checking against (skb->len) is the full packet size, headers and
> all.

Nevermind, I turned off gso/tso on eth0 (outgoing interface) and it still
happens.

I guess netfilter or something else is causing this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux