On 03.02.2011 16:42, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On 03/02/11 15:23, Hans Schillstrom wrote: >>> If this is accepted, I think this has to be merge with the (already >>> overloaded) MARK target. >> >> I have no opinion about that, others might have. > > Better put it in the MARK target with a new revision. I think that > Patrick is going to ask you this. > > I don't know why I had the impression that MARK is overload, it's > actually fine at a first glance to the code. I don't think we should merge this with the MARK target, I don't want to bloat the simple mark structure with all the parameters needed for this module. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
