Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] Relationship between conntrack and firewall rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag 20 Januar 2011, 23:52:25 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
> On Thursday 2011-01-20 23:47, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >as a firewall admin I would like to see which rules allow
> >the connections through my firewall.
> >A relationship between conntrack and firewall rules would be nice.
> >The next five patches bring this feature to the Linux Netfilter.
> >
> >First a small example.
> >Consider this iptables rules:
> >-A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j APPROVE --rule-id 1
> >-A OUTPUT -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j APPROVE --rule-id 2
> >-A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -j APPROVE --rule-id 3
> >-A INPUT -p icmp -m state --state NEW -j APPROVE --rule-id 4
> >
> >The APPROVE target is the same as ACCEPT but it stores also a rule id into
> >the connection tracking entry.
> 
> What about connmark? You could have used that. Perhaps combined with the
> use of -j TRACE that can show which rules were processed before a
> verdict was issued.

Yeah, I know commark and TRACE but they are quite clumsy to use for such a purpose.
Especially writing firewall rules becomes more complex.

//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux