From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
ret != NF_QUEUE only works in the "--queue-num 0" case; for
queues > 0 the test should be '(ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK) != NF_QUEUE'.
However, NF_QUEUE no longer DROPs the skb unconditionally if queueing
fails (due to NF_VERDICT_FLAG_QUEUE_BYPASS verdict flag), so the
re-route test should also be performed if this flag is set in the
verdict.
The full test would then look something like
&& ((ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK) == NF_QUEUE && (ret & NF_VERDICT_FLAG_QUEUE_BYPASS))
This is rather ugly, so just remove the NF_QUEUE test altogether.
The only effect is that we might perform an unnecessary route lookup
in the NF_QUEUE case.
ip6table_mangle did not have such a check.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
index 294a2a3..aef5d1f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ ipt_mangle_out(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *out)
ret = ipt_do_table(skb, NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT, NULL, out,
dev_net(out)->ipv4.iptable_mangle);
/* Reroute for ANY change. */
- if (ret != NF_DROP && ret != NF_STOLEN && ret != NF_QUEUE) {
+ if (ret != NF_DROP && ret != NF_STOLEN) {
iph = ip_hdr(skb);
if (iph->saddr != saddr ||
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
