On 20.01.2011 01:50, David Miller wrote: > I'm undoing my pull, what was this build tested against? My build tests didn't include header-install. No idea what Jan tested against. > In particular this commit breaks the build: > > Subject: [PATCH 68/79] netfilter: xtables: add missing header files to export list > > Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> > ... > @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ header-y += xt_rateest.h > header-y += xt_realm.h > header-y += xt_recent.h > header-y += xt_sctp.h > +header-y += xt_secmark.h > +header-y += xt_socket.h > header-y += xt_state.h > header-y += xt_statistic.h > header-y += xt_string.h > > No active tree has a include/linux/netfilter/xt_secmark.h file. Therefore > we end up with: > > make[2]: `scripts/unifdef' is up to date. > make[4]: *** No rule to make target `/home/davem/src/GIT/net-next-2.6/include/linux/netfilter/xt_secmark.h', needed by `/home/davem/src/GIT/net-next-2.6/usr/include/linux/netfilter/.install'. Stop. > > Did you mean xt_SECMARK.h (caps)? I guess so. Jan, please fix this up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
