On 13/01/11 12:32, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 Ã 12:23 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso a Ãcrit : >> Hi Eric, >> >> On 13/01/11 12:13, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> ipt_CLUSTERIP users might hit this annoying printk, if they forgot an >>> "iptables -I INPUT -m state --state INVALID -j DROP" before CLUSTERIP >>> rule. We could use net_ratelimit() here, or not log the message at all. >>> I chose to log it once per config. >> >> I think that this should be converted to pr_debug() instead, there's >> also another reference to "unknown protocol" that should be converted as >> well. > > Problem is pr_debug() is a noop most of the time, > and printk(KERN_DEBUG is a bit ugly ... > > If we print the message once, better to really print it ;) But printing this does not provide any useful information. The first packet that does not belong to the cluster node that has received the packet, or the first invalid packet, will trigger this. Moreover, this confuses users since they can do nothing if they receive this message. Moreover, this target should be supersedes by the cluster match, which has been there for quite some time (it's also more flexible). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
