On Friday 2011-01-07 02:31, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> On 04/01/11 03:14, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>> /* Modifiers to GET request */
>>>> #define NLM_F_ROOT 0x100
>>>> #define NLM_F_MATCH 0x200
>>>> #define NLM_F_ATOMIC 0x400
>>>> #define NLM_F_DUMP (NLM_F_ROOT|NLM_F_MATCH)
>> [...]
>>>> [N.B.: I am also wondering whether
>>>> (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP
>>>> may have been desired, because NLM_F_DUMP is composed of two bits.]
>>>
>>> Someone may include NLM_F_ATOMIC to a dump operation, in that case the
>>> checking that you propose is not valid.
>>
>> Are you saying that NLM_F_MATCH and NLM_F_ATOMIC are mutually
>> exclusive, and that NLM_F_ROOT|NLM_F_ATOMIC would also signal a
>> dump operation? Otherwise the test that Jan proposes looks valid
>> to me.
>
>Indeed, Jan's test is fine to fix this. Please, send a patch to Davem asap.
Turns out genetlink isn't the only place where &NLM_F_DUMP is used
without ==NLM_F_DUMP.
Thus I am adding it to other spots in net/ too.
parent c235848c5a76520b90cf31bfbcc17720b24745a2 (v2.6.37-rc1-230-gc235848)
commit eaab9042b29931730d6785bb3f27b174fb2f5518
Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jan 7 13:53:49 2011 +0100
netlink: test for all flags of the NLM_F_DUMP composite
Due to NLM_F_DUMP is composed of two bits, NLM_F_ROOT | NLM_F_MATCH,
when doing "if (x & NLM_F_DUMP)", it tests for _either_ of the bits
being set. Because NLM_F_MATCH's value overlaps with NLM_F_EXCL,
non-dump requests with NLM_F_EXCL set are mistaken as dump requests.
Substitute the condition to test for _all_ bits being set.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/inet_diag.c | 2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 4 ++--
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 2 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 8121268..14dcb43 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static int rtnetlink_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
if (kind != 2 && security_netlink_recv(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
- if (kind == 2 && nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_DUMP) {
+ if (kind == 2 && (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP) {
struct sock *rtnl;
rtnl_dumpit_func dumpit;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
index 2ada171..2746c1f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static int inet_diag_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
nlmsg_len(nlh) < hdrlen)
return -EINVAL;
- if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) {
+ if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP) {
if (nlmsg_attrlen(nlh, hdrlen)) {
struct nlattr *attr;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index 7f59be8..edc737e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ ctnetlink_get_conntrack(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
u16 zone;
int err;
- if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP)
+ if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP)
return netlink_dump_start(ctnl, skb, nlh, ctnetlink_dump_table,
ctnetlink_done);
@@ -1788,7 +1788,7 @@ ctnetlink_get_expect(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
u16 zone;
int err;
- if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) {
+ if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP) {
return netlink_dump_start(ctnl, skb, nlh,
ctnetlink_exp_dump_table,
ctnetlink_exp_done);
diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
index 1781d99..f83cb37 100644
--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ static int genl_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
security_netlink_recv(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
- if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) {
+ if ((nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP) {
if (ops->dumpit == NULL)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 8bae6b2..6770895 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2174,7 +2174,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
if ((type == (XFRM_MSG_GETSA - XFRM_MSG_BASE) ||
type == (XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE)) &&
- (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP)) {
+ (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) == NLM_F_DUMP) {
if (link->dump == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
--
# Created with git-export-patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
