Re: inconsistent address treatment.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Clark a écrit :
> On 12/23/2010 02:52 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>
>> Stephen Clark a écrit :
>>    
>>> Why the inconsistency in the way addresses are treated. I can use -d
>>> 2.2.2.2/32
>>>    but not --to-source 205.201.149.214/32
>>>      
>> Because -d takes a prefix and --to-source takes an address range.
> 
> So? you can't parse
> 
> 205.201.149.214/32-205.201.149.218/32

a.b.c.d/32 is a prefix notation, even though it represents a single
address. IMO it does not make sense to use a prefix notation in an
interval, so I don't see why the parser should handle it. AFAICS, other
commands such as 'ip' from iproute don't accept /32 prefixes where a
single address is expected either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux