Re: inconsistent address treatment.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/23/2010 04:53 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2010-12-23 15:12, Stephen Clark wrote:

Hello,

Why the inconsistency in the way addresses are treated. I can use -d 2.2.2.2/32
but not --to-source 205.201.149.214/32

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -s 10.0.128.0/17 -d 2.2.2.2/32 -j SNAT
--to-source 205.201.149.214/32
What inconsistency?
If you try the above command you get a complaint about

--to-source 205.201.149.214/32
you have to use
--to-source 205.201.149.214

iptables 1.4.5.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux