Re: [*v2 PATCH 08/22] IPVS: netns preparation for proto_sctp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, December 13, 2010 23:23:01 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:38:16PM +0100, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
> > In this phase (one), all local vars will be moved to ipvs struct.
> > 
> > Remaining work, add param struct net *net to a couple of
> > functions that is common for all protos and use ip_vs_proto_data
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> > index 521b827..108ae0c 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
> > @@ -1101,43 +1098,51 @@ static int sctp_app_conn_bind(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> >  			goto out;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -	spin_unlock(&sctp_app_lock);
> > +	spin_unlock(&ipvs->sctp_app_lock);
> >  out:
> >  	return result;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void ip_vs_sctp_init(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp)
> > +/* ---------------------------------------------
> > + *   timeouts is netns related now.
> > + * ---------------------------------------------
> > + */
> > +static void __ip_vs_sctp_init(struct net *net, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd)
> >  {
> > -	IP_VS_INIT_HASH_TABLE(sctp_apps);
> > -	pp->timeout_table = sctp_timeouts;
> > -}
> > +	struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(net);
> >  
> > +	ip_vs_init_hash_table(ipvs->sctp_apps, SCTP_APP_TAB_SIZE);
> > +	spin_lock_init(&ipvs->tcp_app_lock);
> > +	pd->timeout_table = ip_vs_create_timeout_table((int*)sctp_timeouts,
> > +							sizeof(sctp_timeouts));
> > +}
> >  
> > -static void ip_vs_sctp_exit(struct ip_vs_protocol *pp)
> > +static void __ip_vs_sctp_exit(struct net *net, struct ip_vs_proto_data *pd)
> >  {
> > -
> > +	kfree(pd->timeout_table);
> >  }
> >  
> >  struct ip_vs_protocol ip_vs_protocol_sctp = {
> > -	.name = "SCTP",
> > -	.protocol = IPPROTO_SCTP,
> > -	.num_states = IP_VS_SCTP_S_LAST,
> > -	.dont_defrag = 0,
> > -	.appcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
> > -	.init = ip_vs_sctp_init,
> > -	.exit = ip_vs_sctp_exit,

init & exit changed to NULL

> > -	.register_app = sctp_register_app,
> > +	.name		= "SCTP",
> > +	.protocol	= IPPROTO_SCTP,
> > +	.num_states	= IP_VS_SCTP_S_LAST,
> > +	.dont_defrag	= 0,
> > +	.init 		= NULL,
> > +	.exit 		= NULL,
> > +	.init_netns 	= __ip_vs_sctp_init,
> > +	.exit_netns 	= __ip_vs_sctp_exit,

init_netns and exit_netns added

> > +	.register_app	= sctp_register_app,
> >  	.unregister_app = sctp_unregister_app,
> > -	.conn_schedule = sctp_conn_schedule,
> > -	.conn_in_get = ip_vs_conn_in_get_proto,
> > -	.conn_out_get = ip_vs_conn_out_get_proto,
> > -	.snat_handler = sctp_snat_handler,
> > -	.dnat_handler = sctp_dnat_handler,
> > -	.csum_check = sctp_csum_check,
> > -	.state_name = sctp_state_name,
> > +	.conn_schedule	= sctp_conn_schedule,
> > +	.conn_in_get	= ip_vs_conn_in_get_proto,
> > +	.conn_out_get	= ip_vs_conn_out_get_proto,
> > +	.snat_handler	= sctp_snat_handler,
> > +	.dnat_handler	= sctp_dnat_handler,
> > +	.csum_check	= sctp_csum_check,
> > +	.state_name	= sctp_state_name,
> >  	.state_transition = sctp_state_transition,
> > -	.app_conn_bind = sctp_app_conn_bind,
> > -	.debug_packet = ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
> > -	.timeout_change = sctp_timeout_change,
> > -	.set_state_timeout = sctp_set_state_timeout,
> > +	.app_conn_bind	= sctp_app_conn_bind,
> > +	.debug_packet	= ip_vs_tcpudp_debug_packet,
> > +	.timeout_change	= NULL,
> > +/*	.set_state_timeout = sctp_set_state_timeout, */

set_state_timout removed or comment-out

> >  };
> 
> While I'm not a big fan or the original formatting,
> the whitespace changes above make it rather difficult to see
> what is really being changed. Could you either drop
> the whitespace changes or move them into a separate patch?

I do agree that the changes is hard to see,
It's the same changes that's in tcp and udp.
I don't think it's worth the effort to make a new patch just for that,
but if you still insists ...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux