On 15.11.2010 12:19, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 15.11.2010 10:25, Changli Gao wrote:
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS
>>> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h
>>> index 0772d29..1a9f96d 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_extend.h
>>> @@ -7,10 +7,16 @@
>>>
>>> enum nf_ct_ext_id {
>>> NF_CT_EXT_HELPER,
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NF_NAT) || defined(CONFIG_NF_NAT_MODULE)
>>> NF_CT_EXT_NAT,
>>> +#endif
>>> NF_CT_EXT_ACCT,
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_EVENTS
>>> NF_CT_EXT_ECACHE,
>>> +#endif
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES
>>> NF_CT_EXT_ZONE,
>>> +#endif
>>> NF_CT_EXT_NUM,
>>
>> What is the purpose of #ifdef'ing the extension IDs?
>>
>
> struct nf_ct_ext {
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> u8 offset[NF_CT_EXT_NUM];
> u8 len;
> char data[0];
> };
>
> Less IDs make nf_ct_ext smaller.
Right, thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
