On 11.11.2010 12:45, Frederic Leroy wrote:
> Le Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:38:41 +0100,
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> On 09.11.2010 21:51, Frederic Leroy wrote:
>>> Le Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:28:09 +0100 (CET),
>>> Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Alas, when I originally coded NFPROTO_UNSPEC wildcard support,
>>>> I allowed for same-rev overloading, as in:
>>>>
>>>> static struct xt_target classify_tg_reg[] __read_mostly = {
>>>> {
>>>> [...]
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a patch against my previous patch with your insights.
>>> I had time to test it.
>>
>> This seems like the best we can do for now. Does it work as intended?
>
> Yes, it works as intended.
>
> Nevertheless, I plan to update kernel and arptables to match NF_INET_*.
> I should have time to do it for sunday.
You can't change the numerical values, that would break compatibility.
That basically leaves the option of using NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING instead
of NF_ARP_IN etc, which would make things highly confusing :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
