On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:07:38PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > On Friday 22 October 2010 21:05:48 Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > > This patch just contains ip_vs_ctl > > > > > > Signed-off-by:Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > > > index ca8ec8c..7e99cbc 100644 > > > --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > > > +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c > > > > [ snip ] > > Hi Hans, > > > > is there a reason that the order some of the entries in > > vs_vars has been switched around? > > > Yes there is, when vars will be copied to it's own NS it's a lot easier > when they are in sequence and without a potential insert in the middle > the #if 0 ... > > have a look at __ip_vs_control_init(struct net *net) Ok, I suspected something like that. In that case I think there may be a problem with the way that I handled sysctl_ip_vs_conntrack. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
