On 2010-10-21, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:39 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 2010-10-20 13:21, KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
> >
> > >@@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ struct in6_flowlabel_req {
> > > /* RFC5082: Generalized Ttl Security Mechanism */
> > > #define IPV6_MINHOPCOUNT 73
> > >
> > >+#define IPV6_ORIGDSTADDR 74
> > >+#define IPV6_RECVORIGDSTADDR IPV6_ORIGDSTADDR
> > >+#define IPV6_TRANSPARENT 75
> > >+
> >
> > Why do we actually need two names for the same thing?
>
> IPV6_RECVORIGDSTADDR is the name of the socket option you're supposed to
> set if you require the original destination address. IPV6_ORIGDSTADDR is
> the name of the ancillary message you get with the actual address in it.
> Just like we have it for IP_TOS/IP_RECVTOS, for example.
I agree.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
