On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:45 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> (2010/10/20 20:21), KOVACS Krisztian wrote:
> > From: Balazs Scheidler<bazsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler<bazsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: KOVACS Krisztian<hidden@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> > index 6022098..9480572 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> > @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ int inet6_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
> > */
> > v4addr = LOOPBACK4_IPV6;
> > if (!(addr_type& IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST)) {
> > - if (!ipv6_chk_addr(net,&addr->sin6_addr,
> > + if (!inet->transparent&& !ipv6_chk_addr(net,&addr->sin6_addr,
> > dev, 0)) {
> > err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> >
>
> As I wrote before in other thread, this does not seem sufficient --
> well, it is sufficient to allow non-local bind, but before we're
> allowing this, we need add checks of source address in sending side.
Can you please elaborate or point us to the other thread? Is it some
kind of address-type check that we miss?
--
Bazsi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
