Le samedi 09 octobre 2010 Ã 06:21 +0200, Jan Engelhardt a Ãcrit : > I must say I am surprised. > > There already exists a maintained xt_TARPIT in Xtables-addons, and > it seems like your patch is a duplicate effort of it. > > If you have any updates to xt_TARPIT, I would recommend the strategy > that Luciano Coelho used when he wanted to have xt_condition in > the main kernel: > > 1. take the maintained version from Xt-a > 2. submit any updates to the Xt-a file, if feasible > 3. once processed, submit that then for Linux kernel inclusion > 4. apply further updates to the LK file, if needed > > That way it is way easier to know what specifically new features you > have added to xt_TARPIT, if any. > Agreed, so much messages on netdev and netfilter-devel, only to rewrite a TARPIT module :-( -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
