On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Three variables ? > > static atomic_t rnd __read_mostly; > > if (unlikely(!atomic_read(&rnd))) { > unsigned int val; > > get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val)); > if (!val) > val = 1; > atomic_cmpxchg(&rnd, 0, val); > } > Good idea. However, atomic_t is a volatile variable, and it prevent ILP. I think maybe it hurts the likely case. cmpxchg() is an atomic operations, so is the bellow code better? static unsigned long rnd __read_mostly; if (unlikely(!rnd)) { unsigned long val; get_random_bytes(&val, sizeof(val)); if (!val) val = 1; cmpxchg(&rnd, 0, val); } Thanks. -- Regards, Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html