Hello, So here's my patch to include the condition target in the existing condition module. This patch is supposed to be applied on top of the previous xt_condition patches I submitted and is intended for 2.6.37 (I'll resend all the 3 patches when the next tree starts accepting patches again). One thing that came to my mind was whether it would make sense to rename this match/target combo to "variable" instead of "condition". To me it makes more sense to call it variable than condition, since I have changed the value from boolean to u32. On the other hand, it could become very confusing because it used to be called condition in its xtables-addons days... Your comments are appreciated! Cheers, Luca. Luciano Coelho (1): netfilter: xt_condition: add condition target support include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h | 13 ++- net/netfilter/Kconfig | 19 ++-- net/netfilter/Makefile | 2 +- net/netfilter/xt_condition.c | 194 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 4 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
