From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> Hello, Here v2 of the xt_condition patch, it contains some changes suggested by Jan. When these patches get accepted, I'll send the implementation of the condition target, as discussed before. In RFC v2 I've made a few changes as discussed in the review: * Removed per-netns module parameters * Use par->net instead of current->nsproxy->net_ns * Fix file-leak in procfs when exiting the netns I didn't get any more comments in RFC v2, so I assume it is okay to send it for inclusion. >From [RFC v2] to [PATCH], I've only rebased and added a new patch to support u32 instead of boolean as the value for the condition. In PATCH v2: * Bumped up the revision to 2 * Changed the buffer declaration to have the size of the biggest possible u32 string * Return -ERANGE instead of -EINVALID when the value passed is too big. Cheers, Luca. Luciano Coelho (2): netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition netfilter: xt_condition: change the value from boolean to u32 include/linux/netfilter/Kbuild | 1 + include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h | 15 ++ net/netfilter/Kconfig | 8 + net/netfilter/Makefile | 1 + net/netfilter/xt_condition.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h create mode 100644 net/netfilter/xt_condition.c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
