[PATCH 0/2] netfilter: xtables: xt_condition inclusion and change to u32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi again,

Here is the xt_condition patch, hopefully for inclusion this time.

When these patches get accepted, I'll send the implementation of the condition
target, as discussed before.

In RFC v2 I've made a few changes as discussed in the review:

  * Removed per-netns module parameters
  * Use par->net instead of current->nsproxy->net_ns
  * Fix file-leak in procfs when exiting the netns

I didn't get any more comments in RFC v2, so I assume it is okay to send it for
inclusion.

>From [RFC v2] to [PATCH], I've only rebased and added a new patch to support
u32 instead of boolean as the value for the condition.

Cheers,
Luca.

PS: I've been on vacation, that's why it took sometime to submit this patch again.


Luciano Coelho (2):
  netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition
  netfilter: xt_condition: change the value from boolean to u32

 include/linux/netfilter/Kbuild         |    1 +
 include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h |   15 ++
 net/netfilter/Kconfig                  |    8 +
 net/netfilter/Makefile                 |    1 +
 net/netfilter/xt_condition.c           |  268 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h
 create mode 100644 net/netfilter/xt_condition.c

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux