On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 16:27 +0200, ext Changli Gao wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Luciano Coelho > <luciano.coelho@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@testbed.(none)> > > > > Hi all, > > > > As discussed earlier, I've been looking for a way to enable and disable the > > condition match automatically, in the netfilter tables themselves (ie. without > > the need to use procfs). > > > > This is my initial implementation. Please let me know how it looks. The first > > patch is based on the xt_condition patch that Jan sent to the list (but which > > has not been finalized for inclusion yet). Once the condition match gets > > applied, I'll forward port my patch and submit it again. > > > > Cheers, > > Luca. > > > > Luciano Coelho (2): > > netfilter: xt_condition: export list management code > > netfilter: xtables: implement CONDITION target > > > > include/linux/netfilter/Kbuild | 1 + > > include/linux/netfilter/xt_CONDITION.h | 39 +++++++++++ > > include/linux/netfilter/xt_condition.h | 17 +++++- > > net/netfilter/Kconfig | 12 ++++ > > net/netfilter/Makefile | 1 + > > net/netfilter/xt_CONDITION.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > net/netfilter/xt_condition.c | 82 ++++++++++++++---------- > > Why not combine xt_CONDITION.c and xt_condition.c into xt_condition.c, > like xt_mark.c? I just thought that someone may want to use the condition match without using the CONDITION target, that's why I've put it in a different module. But I don't have a strong opinion about this. If everybody agrees on that, I can merge the code into a single module. Thanks for your comment. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
