On Friday 2010-07-16 13:10, Luciano Coelho wrote: >Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Thursday 2010-04-22 13:14, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >> > This looks better, thanks. A few remaining questions about things >> > I missed previously: >> >> Will deal with it shortly. > >Are you planning to resend this patch with the changes Patrick >suggested? I can try. >As you may have seen in my earlier rfc email, I'm interested in >something similar to the condition match. I'm not sure whether the best >approach is to create a CONDITION target where we can set the condition >variable in the iptables itself or if it is better to create a new >"variable match" and an accompanying "VARIABLE target" that keeps the >variables in memory, instead of using procfs. procfs is in memory :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
