Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: libxt_rateest: fix bps options for iptables-save

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 15.07.2010 18:14, schrieb Luciano Coelho:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 18:10 +0200, ext Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Am 15.07.2010 18:04, schrieb Luciano Coelho:
>>> The output generated by the libxt_rateest extension for bps matches
>>> was wrong and could not be restored properly.  This patch fixes this
>>> problem by using the correct options in the right order when saving
>>> the table.
>>
>> Applied, thanks.
> 
> A quick question: do you apply this to iptables-next? Or iptables-next
> will only be aligned with master when you merge them (when the stuff
> included in iptables-next gets released in the kernel)?
> 

This one was applied to the master branch. The iptables-next branch
contains support for new features that will be merged during the
next merge window. The branch will be merged once the iptables
release for the 2.6.35 kernel is out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux