On Monday 2010-07-05 11:36, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> The command I used was >> >> ping6 localhost -fc 500 -i .001 >> >> this sends 500 packets in near-flood fashion (-i0 would lead to >> packet drops). >> >> Xtables1 blob-style 2.6.31-rc4: >> 500 packets transmitted, 500 received, 0% packet loss, time 3532ms >> Xtables1 blob-style 2.6.34: >> 500 packets transmitted, 500 received, 0% packet loss, time 3405ms >> Xtables2 (linked lists) 2.6.35-rc1: >> 500 packets transmitted, 500 received, 0% packet loss, time 14775ms >> nftables (uses linked lists) 2.6.31-rc4: >> 500 packets transmitted, 500 received, 0% packet loss, time 16198ms >> >> Do you have any suggestions for improvement though? > >I dont understand how it is possible to spend so much time per packet, >just adding few pointers :) >Are you sure you dont hit another problem ? If you see where this went awry, I'd be grateful. (The tests have been run on a single CPU.) >Could you give us the rules you use ? Attached.
Attachment:
bigrules2.xz
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
bigrules2.nft.xz
Description: Binary data
