On Friday 2010-07-02 11:52, kaber@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >2.6.34 introduced 'conntrack zones' to deal with cases where packets >from multiple identical networks are handled by conntrack/NAT. Packets >are looped through veth devices, during which they are NATed to private >addresses, after which they can continue normally through the stack >and possibly have NAT rules applied a second time. > >This works well, but is needlessly complicated for cases where only >a single SNAT/DNAT mapping needs to be applied to these packets. I still have not grasped why SNAT is needed in the INPUT path. For the tunnel scenario that you wanted to build I could not find a reason to do SNAT in that place - since the non-encapsulated packets don't go through INPUT anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
