Re: [RFC PATCH] netfilter: nf_nat: support user-specified SNAT rules in LOCAL_IN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 2010-06-17 09:55, Patrick McHardy wrote:

>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Thursday 2010-06-17 09:44, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>   
>>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I am not sure I follow whatever this is supposed to do.
>>>>
>>>> Packet from eth0: src=10.0.0.15 dst=10.0.1.22
>>>> INPUT#NETMAP will dst transform that to dst=10.0.0.22
>>>>       
>>> nat/INPUT performs source NAT, not destination NAT.
>>>
>>>     
>>>> POSTROUTING#NETMAP will src transform that to src=10.0.0.15
>>>>
>>>> Is is this step that makes no sense to me.
>>>>       
>>> Does it make sense now?
>>>     
>>
>> Somewhat, but there's still
>>
>>   
>>>>> However this doesn't work for packets  destined for the
>>>>> machine performing NAT itself
>>>>>         
>>
>> Why would it not? What would cause misdelivery if PREROUTING
>> was used instead of INPUT?
>>   
>
>PREROUTING performs DNAT. The purpose is to map the two
>identical networks to non-clashing networks. Just consider two
>connections from the same source address and port number
>to the same destination.
>

If veth0 has 10.0.0.0/24 and veth1 has 10.0.0.0/24,
wouldn't Linux's ARP mechanism already be confused, in
that it only sends ARP to the first network matching
the subnet?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux