Re: [PATCH] iptables: optionally disable largefile support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2010-05-10 17:25, Patrick McHardy wrote:

>Karl Hiramoto wrote:
>> On 05/10/2010 10:00 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> What is the actual problem you are experiencing? If the toolchain does
>>> not support largefiles, the -D macros should not do anything, so that
>>> conversely, their presence is not harmful.
>>>    
>> Uclibc include headers do checking see:
>> 
>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/tree/include/features.h#n216
>> 
>> 
>> You get errors like:
>> 
>> 
>> usr/include/features.h:383:4: error: #error It appears you have defined
>> _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. Unfortunately, uClibc was built without large file
>> support enabled.
>> In file included from /build_armeb/staging_dir/usr/include/stdio.h:72,
>>                  from libiptc/libip4tc.c:18:
>> /build_armeb/staging_dir/usr/include/bits/uClibc_stdio.h:72:2: error:
>> #error Sorry... uClibc was built without large file support!
>> In file included from libiptc/libip4tc.c:18:
>> /build_armeb/staging_dir/usr/include/stdio.h:83: error: expected '=',
>> ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'fpos_t'
>> In file included from libiptc/libip4tc.c:18:
>> /build_armeb/staging_dir/usr/include/stdio.h:709: error: expected
>> declaration specifiers or '...' before 'fpos_t'
>> /build_armeb/staging_dir/usr/include/stdio.h:711: error: expected ';',
>> ',' or ')' before '*' token
>> 
>> 
>> With this patch everything compiles and works fine.
>
>Thanks for the explanation. Jan, can I assume you're OK with this patch?

Yeah. Time to bugger uclibc now :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux