Re: DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 23 avril 2010 à 12:55 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
>> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> OK but a lookup last a fraction of a micro second, unless interrupted by
>>> hard irq.
>>>
>>> Probability of a change during a lookup should be very very small.
>>>
>>> Note that the scenario for a restart is :
>>>
>>> The lookup go through the chain.
>>> While it is examining one object, this object is deleted.
>>> The object is re-allocated by another cpu and inserted to a new chain.
>> I think another scenario that seems a bit more likely would be
>> that a new entry is added to the chain after it was fully searched.
>> Perhaps we could continue searching at the last position if the
>> last entry is not a nulls entry to improve this.
> 
> But the last entry is always a nulls entry, what do you mean exactly ?
> 
> When an unsert (of a fresh object, not a reused one) is done, this
> doesnt affect lookups in any way, since its done at the head of list.

Right, I missed that :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux