On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le jeudi 15 avril 2010 à 14:53 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit : >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yes, that is why vmalloc() is perfect for this case. No extra memory for >> >> management, but one pointer for each page of memory. >> > >> > I agree, if it works for conntrack, it certainly also works for >> > nfnetlink_queue. >> > >> >> I need to allocate memory in atomic section, so vmalloc() can't be used. :( >> >> does double check mechanism works? >> > > Allocate memory to setup a hash table in atomic section ? > > Changli you can forget this right now, this is not serious. > > We are not going to use this thing because your requirements are crazy. > OK, I'll keep it myself. :) -- Regards, Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html