Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2010-04-13 15:45, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> +static bool
>>> +tee_tg_route4(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_tee_tginfo *info)
>>> +{
>>> + const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
>>> + struct rtable *rt;
>>> + struct flowi fl;
>>> +
>>> + memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
>>> + fl.nl_u.ip4_u.daddr = info->gw.ip;
>>> + fl.nl_u.ip4_u.tos = RT_TOS(iph->tos);
>>> + fl.nl_u.ip4_u.scope = RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE;
>>> +
>>> + if (ip_route_output_key(dev_net(skb->dev), &rt, &fl) != 0) {
>> You can't use skb->dev in modules that are valid to use in LOCAL_OUT.
>>
>>> +#ifdef WITH_CONNTRACK
>>> + nf_conntrack_put(skb->nfct);
>>> + skb->nfct = &tee_track.ct_general;
>>> + skb->nfctinfo = IP_CT_NEW;
>>> + nf_conntrack_get(skb->nfct);
>>> +#endif
>> Why do we still need this? I thought the reentrancy-counter should take
>> care of this?
>
> Did I really delete that commit... it's done so that conntrack
> does not count the duplicated packets towards the original
> connection.
Simply untrack it perhaps?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
