On Tuesday 2010-04-13 15:33, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c >> index f314ba4..7e10f62 100644 >> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c >> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c >> @@ -172,8 +172,9 @@ int ip6_output(struct sk_buff *skb) >> return 0; >> } >> >> - return NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_POST_ROUTING, skb, NULL, dev, >> - ip6_finish_output); >> + return NF_HOOK_COND(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_POST_ROUTING, skb, NULL, dev, >> + ip6_finish_output, >> + !(IP6CB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_REROUTED)); > >This needs to use an IP6SKB value to avoid clashes. I've fixed it up >as follows: Would merging the IPSKB and IP6SKB flags be worth it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
