On Tuesday 2010-04-13 11:57, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
>> index 8e23d8f..2010b56 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ static const char *const xt_prefix[NFPROTO_NUMPROTO] = {
>> [NFPROTO_IPV6] = "ip6",
>> };
>>
>> +/* Allow this many total (re)entries. */
>> +static unsigned int xt_jumpstack_multiplier = 2;
>> +module_param_named(jumpstack_multiplier, xt_jumpstack_multiplier,
>> + uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>> +
>
>This seems very wrong. Why should the user care about this?
Who said every sysfs variable is for end-users?
>Perhaps actually getting rid of
>the per-cpu copies of the ruleset could convince me :)
It will be my pleasure - actually, I have patches for that
just waiting!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
