On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:36:07 +0200, Patrick McHardy said: > Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > Well, it *changed* it. Does the rcu_defererence_check() only fire on the > > first time it hits something, so we've fixed the first one and now we get to > > see the second one? > > It appears that way, otherwise you should have seen a second warning in > nf_conntrack_ecache the last time. > > > (For what it's worth, if this is going to be one-at-a-time whack-a-mole, I'm > > OK on that, just want to know up front.) > > I went through the other files and I believe this should be it. > We already removed most of these incorrect rcu_dereference() > calls a while back. Confirming - the second version of the patch fixes all the network-related RCU complaints I've been able to trigger...
Attachment:
pgpRzYJ1he4Kv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
