Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Thursday 2010-04-01 13:46, Mark Ryden wrote: > >> Is there a way to avoid this when adding such a rule, >> using some default mechansim ? > > Let's ask Patrick: > > What do you think of enabling iptables to assume targets with .size=0 > (which don't have options by design) if there was no libxt_XYZ.so found? > That would make things like libxt_NOTRACK.c obsolete, too. No general objections, but how many modules are there really that don't take options? Feel free to try, if your patch doesn't affect error reporting and stays below 15 lines, I'll apply it :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
